Presentation of the final paper

1. Paper outlines with the title and 1-3 keywords (e.g., euthanasia, gay and lesbian marriage, animal rights, etc).

Title:
Abortion: A Serious Challenge between Morality and Women’s right

Key words:

abortion, women's human rights

I search the information on internet database with these words in English way. Because I want to know more about the cases and the world trend of abortion. By using the keywords, I do find many information and some of them support to my opinion.

Outlines:

1. Women's consideration (Reasons for abortion)

2. Human rights (Research about the abortion laws)

3. Looking from another standpoints ( the thoughts of those who anti-abortion)




2. Topics/themes in four annotations and their intended audiences (e.g., general, academic, customers, peers and friends, other). Do the library and Web sources provide sound reasons and proper evidence? Do you use shared contextual knowledge (e.g.,experiences, emotions, cultures) to support your argument and opinions?

(1) The first annotation is videos about the opinions of Obama, the president-elect in America. He thinks that limit the liberty of abortion may harm women's human right.

Audience:

People who care about the relationship between abortion and government.

(2) The second annotation is the reasons for abortion, and the match for woman to run after their rights of abortion.

Audience:

People who do not understand why woman have abortion. And the information makes them know the difficulties women face.

(3) The third annotation is the world trend of abortion law.

Audience:

People who do not know the real condition about abortion around the world.

(4) The fourth annotation is the reasons for those who oppose aborton.

Audience:

People who want to know why be anti-abortion


3. Main points in each source that support your own argument/opinions.Do you organize the relations in discourses with a smoth connection and transition between sentences? Do you quote some words, phrases, or sentences directly from the original texts or paraphrase them?

(1) Obama's ideas have in common with my opinions. No woman make the decision casually.

(2) Those reasons can make people to think the necessity of abortion.

(3) Liberalization is the main trend of abortion laws.

(4) Show the purpose that those who oppose abortion might because some religion or the slogan of humanism, instead of caring for women and children.

4. Revisions that you have made compared to annotations.Do you add your peer's opinions? Why or why not?Do you polish your language (e.g., verb tense, s-v agreement, word form, run-on, sentece structure, informal, etc)?

I do add my peer's opinions, because they pointed out the weak point of my article. I know how to make my article more fluent by their opinions.

5. Perspectives that you have added or changed compared to issue papers.Do you find weak reasoning and errors of logic (e.g., irrelevant, oversimplification, overgeneralization, false analogy, undefined terms, etc)? Do you change your question or problem during the course of study?

(1) The weak point of my article is that I could not deny that those unborn babies have human rights too.
(2) I added more ideas to my final paper

1. The world trend
2. The uniqe condition of each woman
3. Looking from the other points of view (anti-abortion)